Search squid archive

Re: performance drop moving from 3.0 to 3.1?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: performance drop moving from 3.0 to 3.1?
From: Alex Crow <alex@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2011 15:32:25 +0000
Cc: squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <4D834F2B.5030305@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1103131924070.29206@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <alpine.DEB.2.00.1103171358450.29206@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4D82C4C2.7020809@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <alpine.DEB.2.00.1103180148430.5340@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4D832AE7.6000703@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4D834F2B.5030305@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.14) Gecko/20110223 Thunderbird/3.1.8

Hi,

Which directive of these should be just "cache" in 3.1?


The one which used to be called "no_cache" back in Squid-2.2.

Amos


So

cache deny all

is the same as

no_cache deny all?

Alex

Follow-Ups:
- Re: performance drop moving from 3.0 to 3.1?
  - From: Amos Jeffries

References:
- performance drop moving from 3.0 to 3.1?
  - From: david
- Re: performance drop moving from 3.0 to 3.1?
  - From: david
- Re: performance drop moving from 3.0 to 3.1?
  - From: Amos Jeffries
- Re: performance drop moving from 3.0 to 3.1?
  - From: david
- Re: performance drop moving from 3.0 to 3.1?
  - From: Alex Crow
- Re: performance drop moving from 3.0 to 3.1?
  - From: Amos Jeffries

Prev by Date: Re: Re: Squid 3.1 and winbind 3.4.7 permissions issue on winbindd_privileged
Next by Date: Re: Re: Squid 3.1 and winbind 3.4.7 permissions issue on winbindd_privileged
Previous by thread: Re: performance drop moving from 3.0 to 3.1?
Next by thread: Re: performance drop moving from 3.0 to 3.1?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Audio Users] [Samba] [Big List of Linux Books] [Linux USB] [Yosemite News]

Powered by Linux