It's in testing stage at the moment so there's about 20 users using the proxy at the moment. From the squid graphs I generated a little while back here's some more info on the usage: Graph of TCP Access (5 minute total) Total Accesses: 75095 Average Accesses: 3128.95 per hour Total Cache Hits: 6960 Average Cache Hits: 290 per hour % Cache Hits: 9.26 % Total Cache IMS Hits: 1569 Average Cache IMS Hits: 65.37 per hour Total Cache Misses: 36863 Average Cache Misses: 1535.95 per hour % Cache Misses: 49.08 % Graph of TCP Transfers (5 minute total) Total Transfers: 608.4 Mb Average Transfers: 25.3 Mb per hour Total Cache Hits: 38.5 Mb Average Cache Hits: 1.6 Mb per hour % Cache Hits: 6.34 % Total Cache IMS Hits: 531.1 Kb Average Cache IMS Hits: 22.1 Kb per hour Total Cache Misses: 509.7 Mb Average Cache Misses: 21.2 Mb per hour % Cache Misses: 83.77 % -----Original Message----- From: Luis Daniel Lucio Quiroz [mailto:luis.daniel.lucio@xxxxxxxxx] Sent: 09 March 2011 17:32 To: squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: Low Hit Rate Le mercredi 9 mars 2011 09:31:31, Mark George a écrit : > Hi, > > I've recently installed Squid 2.7 Stable on Centos 5 and experiencing an > extremely low hit rate at approximately 5%. If I tail the access log I see > a lot of TCP_MISS, and looking at the store log I see a lot of RELEASE and > very little SWAP_OUT. Any ideas how I can go about diagnosing the problem? > > Mark squid hit rate depends on many factors, can you expose us how is your environment, in terms of how many users, bandwith compsumtio for http surfering, etc etc. LD ________________________________________________________________________ This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit: http://www.star.net.uk ________________________________________________________________________
