Search squid archive

Re: tproxy on wccpv2 vs triangle routing

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 15 Feb 2011 11:36:42 +0800, jiluspo wrote:
would still be policy based routing(if thats what its called) wins if
this squidbox uses single ethernet vs single-ethernet(i guess its
single only) wccp tproxy?

Number of NIC on the squid box does not matter. WCCP will not stop being a tunnel.


in squidbox we could use a private ip subnet since its tproxy then it
would have no problem if clients are using public ips?

IPs on the squidbox are not relevant. They are not used in TPROXY.


then a router would need a 3 ethernet port?

It is far easier to manage with 3 NIC, but two is also possible.

TPROXY works nicely when squid is running:
 * directly on a gateway bridge
 * directly on a gateway router
 * on a dedicated NIC hanging off a gateway router

With a little MAC address difficulty and doubling the bandwidth hit on one of the router NIC you can also run it on either side of a 2-NIC router (but must be directly connected to a switch the router has on that NIC).


Amos


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Samba]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Linux USB]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux