>>>> On 01.02.11 19:00, Amos Jeffries wrote: >>>>> If you have a choice HTCP. >>>>> The packets are slightly bigger than ICP (they contain HTTP headers not >>>>> just URLs) but the false-positives are much lower and thus routing >>>>> choices are better. [...] >>> CD has more false positives than ICP but less lag on the real matches >>> and and less background bandwidth consumption. so HTCP should provide even more benefit in addition to cache digests... > CD and ICP certainly work together. I believe CD and HTCP would work as > well. > On 11/02/11 03:28, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: >> of course. My question now is, if they can benefit of all of those... On 11.02.11 03:43, Amos Jeffries wrote: > Well CD + HTCP if you wanted to. > > The lookup queries of HTCP are essentially just ICP with the HTTP > headers attached. So the gains are achieved by the remote peer being > able to determine its yes/no reply in things like the expiry headers, > Vary: and ETag matching or running the cache ACLs on it. I was more asking if the squid sends HTCP queries when it already uses digests. i guess the answer is yes and it does that to avoid false positives... -- Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uhlar@xxxxxxxxxxx ; http://www.fantomas.sk/ Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address. Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu. Spam is for losers who can't get business any other way.
