mÃn 2011-01-24 klockan 18:44 +0100 skrev Ralf Hildebrandt: > > In the section case Squid and the server did not agree on the SSL > > protocol. > > I wonder what went wrong in that case. Could be many things unfortunatey. But to be honest it's not worth investigating in your case. You ended up in the http->https gatewaying case because of a broken application forgetting to enable SSL when sending an https request via the proxy. It's not the right action to have the proxy masquerade this problem by wrapping the request in SSL at the proxy. There is some valid uses of the http->https gatewaying capability, but this is not one of them. However, people using sslbump will run into the same problem quite likely, and for that reason it may be worth investigating. > I did that, disabled v2 but it wouldn't work anyway. But in the > meantime they fixed their broken app :) Good. Regards Henrik
