On Mon, 08 Nov 2010 18:33:37 +0200, Adrian Dascalu <adrian.dascalu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Done some new tests and I found out that caching an URL that has a > different X-Username header will invalidate the other version of that > object. Aha, you can disregard my earlier reply. > > Is this the intended behaviour? Yes. > I mean, Vary header will just inform > there is a new version so everything else is discarded? No, vary header informs Squid whether the cached object may be served or a second fetched. The headers of the new reply informs whether to invalidate the old copy. > If so, is there > a method for cacheing multiple versions of the same URL ? Unique ETag headers are required for that. Amos
