Thanks for the reply, I actually fixed it. Removed the multicast-responder option and just left multicast-sibling. Man this thing flies on 5 boxes with 64gb memory and 10x 50gb solid state drives for the cache :-) I will post working config tomorrow for anyone interested. Chris Toft Mob: 0459 029 454 On 03/11/2010, at 19:51, Josip Almasi <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Chris Toft wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I am having an issue with getting multisite ICP peering to work correctly. >> >> Let me lay out the scenario. >> >> Two sites, one primary and one DR. >> >> 3 squid caches on the primary site, 2 on the secondary site in front of a cluster of 4 back end web servers on each site. >> >> Primary Site >> I have set them up so when requests hit the squid caches (behind a loadbalancer) on each site they will check their squid peers for the image before passing to the back end. This is exactly what we wanted. >> >> Secondary Site >> Again setup the same as the primary site but in the configs all 5 squid caches are listed as multicast peers, but when the secondary site is hit it only checks the caches on that site and then goes to the origin webservers. >> >> The idea being the primary site will get hit 90% of the time and therefore have a "hot" cache, with 10% of traffic hitting the secondary site to give a "warm" cache. This being the case we wanted the secondary site squid caches to use the multicast peers in the primary site before hitting the backend webservers. >> >> I have tried various options of multicast, sibling, parent for the type of server. >> I have tried using weighting to make the primary site caches a higher priority than the backend web servers >> There are no connectivity issues because if I comment out the secondary site webservers in the configs then it will try the primary site squid caches and then fall back to the primary site webservers. >> >> How can I setup the config so that when a request comes in to the secondary site it will check the primary site cache for an object before falling back to the webservers??? > > You got to have class D address to get UDP multicast working, or mbone, > or VPN/private addresses. > Alternative is cache digest, just shorted the time period. And then I'd > recommend using 'proxy' instead of 'sibling' on sec site. > > Regards... The information contained in this e-mail message and any accompanying files is or may be confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, any use, dissemination, reliance, forwarding, printing or copying of this e-mail or any attached files is unauthorised. This e-mail is subject to copyright. No part of it should be reproduced, adapted or communicated without the written consent of the copyright owner. If you have received this e-mail in error please advise the sender immediately by return e-mail or telephone and delete all copies. Fairfax does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of any information contained in this e-mail or attached files. Internet communications are not secure, therefore Fairfax does not accept legal responsibility for the contents of this message or attached files.
