The patch for bug 3068, http://bugs.squid-cache.org/attachment.cgi?id=2291&action=diff is not against 3.1.6? 2010/10/25 Amos Jeffries <squid3@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > On 25/10/10 03:39, Kaiwang Chen wrote: >> >> The cache dir is around 40GB, much less than the limit 128GB, looks >> like bug 3068 is a different problem? We are storing small files, >> average size being around 80KB. > > Bug 3068 is about both the max and current size values being stored in > 32-bit integers and the resulting math problems when either becomes > negative. Your cache_mem display making this clear. > > > One extra though comes back to memory. In the last round of fixes for this > 2x sizing complaint it was uncovered that memory pools were broken for > 64-bit math in 3.1/3.2. You may try turning them off and see if that alters > anything for the better. > >> >> 2010/10/23 Amos Jeffries<squid3@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>: >>> >>> On 22/10/10 04:07, Kaiwang Chen wrote: >>>> >>>> Amos, >>>> >>>> The cache size is configured around 128GB, as reported by mgr:config: >>>> cache_dir aufs /export/squid/cache 131072 32 256 IOEngine=DiskThreads >>>> cache_swap_low 90 >>>> cache_swap_high 95 >>>> cache_mem -1073741824 bytes >>>> memory_replacement_policy lru >>>> cache_replacement_policy lru >>>> memory_pools on >>>> memory_pools_limit 5242880 bytes >>> >>> You have probably hit bug >>> http://bugs.squid-cache.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3068 >>> >>> There is a patch in the report waiting feedback. If you can test it and >>> see >>> if it fixes your problem please > > Amos > -- > Please be using > Current Stable Squid 2.7.STABLE9 or 3.1.8 > Beta testers wanted for 3.2.0.2 >
