On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 10:19 PM, Drunkard Zhang <gongfan193@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > 2010/8/11 Jose Ildefonso Camargo Tolosa <ildefonso.camargo@xxxxxxxxx>: >> Hi! >> >> On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 12:27 AM, Stand H <hstandit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>> >>> --- On Mon, 8/9/10, Jose Ildefonso Camargo Tolosa <ildefonso.camargo@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>>> From: Jose Ildefonso Camargo Tolosa <ildefonso.camargo@xxxxxxxxx> >>>> Subject: Re: how much traffic can squid handle? >>>> To: "Drunkard Zhang" <gongfan193@xxxxxxxxx> >>>> Cc: "Stand H" <hstandit@xxxxxxxxx>, squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >>>> Date: Monday, August 9, 2010, 6:26 PM >>>> Hi! >>>> >>>> On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 8:18 PM, Drunkard Zhang <gongfan193@xxxxxxxxx> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> > >>>> > BTW, may bonding of multiple NICs helps on too many >>>> interrupts. >>>> > >>>> >>>> Or maybe just a good NIC, or a GOOD NIC + bonding :) >>>> >>> >>> Can you recommend a good NIC? >> >> Most Intel have behaved really well with me. As for Broadcom: bad >> luck, I had to disable most of the "hardware assistance", and thus: >> add more load to the server, I'm currently on a "avoid Broadcom" >> policy, but that could change in the future (I'll try them again >> sometime). >> > I got bottle on forcedeth shipped with nVidia MCP55 chipset, not got > problem on Intel e1000e yet, but CPU usage on Intel cores balanced > badly. On the other hand CPU time usage on AMD Opteron cores balanced > very good with same configuration, so confuse about this. > Yeah, e1000 have worked very well for me. Ok, so, you saw that CPU usage on Intel tends to be "inclined" to one of the cores? and on AMD it gets more "balanced"? Also, are talking about network related load here? or just about any processes running on Intel multi-core and AMD multicore.
