On 08.08.2010, Marcus Kool wrote: > Hmmm. maybe it is. some messages on the internet indicate that. Here's the relevant code of the Linux kernel (fs/inode.c), as you can see, NODIRATIME isn't even getting checked if NOATIME is specified, the function returns immediately. /** *touch_atime-update the access time *@mnt: mount the inode is accessed on *@dentry: dentry accessed * *Update the accessed time on an inode and mark it for writeback. *This function automatically handles read only file systems and media, *as well as the "noatime" flag and inode specific "noatime" markers. */ void touch_atime(struct vfsmount *mnt, struct dentry *dentry) { struct inode *inode = dentry->d_inode; struct timespec now; if (inode->i_flags & S_NOATIME) return; if (IS_NOATIME(inode)) return; if ((inode->i_sb->s_flags & MS_NODIRATIME) && S_ISDIR(inode->i_mode)) return; if (mnt->mnt_flags & MNT_NOATIME) return; if ((mnt->mnt_flags & MNT_NODIRATIME) && S_ISDIR(inode->i_mode)) return; now = current_fs_time(inode->i_sb); if (!relatime_need_update(mnt, inode, now)) return; if (timespec_equal(&inode->i_atime, &now)) return; if (mnt_want_write(mnt)) return; inode->i_atime = now; mark_inode_dirty_sync(inode); mnt_drop_write(mnt); } > The man page does not indicate anything but since directories are also files > it is not unlogical that atime is a superset of nodiratime. Yes.