Search squid archive

Re: upgrade

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



So, I could just do yum upgrade squid?

--------------------------------------------------
From: "Amos Jeffries" <squid3@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, August 03, 2010 10:00 AM
To: <squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re:  upgrade

Riaan Nolan wrote:
Centos meh. their repo's are so far behind they think they are in front.

It's better to upgrade. Since I upgraded things started working
properly, like external ACLs with ldap_groups in Active Directory.
No more problems for me.

 > Can I leave the existing cache in place and config files or
I trashed my existing cache, so I would not know if it will work.

Don't compile it from SRC ... get the src RPM e.g
yum install rpm-build openjade linuxdoc-tools openldap-devel pam-devel
openssl-devel httpd rpm-devel
wget
http://www.jur-linux.com/rpms/el-updates/5Client/SRPMS/squid-3.1.0.15-2.el5.src.rpm rpm -ivh squid-3.1.0.15-2.el5.src.rpm
rpmbuild -bb squid.spec

Looks like they have 3.1.4 in there too. Either one.


All the best to you :)

ciao/Riaan

On 03/08/2010 14:44, J. Webster wrote:
I currently have squid 2.6 running on centos - they haven't updated =
their
repository yet.
WIll upgrading to 3.1.6 have any performance
enhancements?

Over 2.6 definitely.
A small bit in speed, and a LOT in HTTP/1.1 protocol support which amounts to streamlining and bandwidth.

Can I leave the existing cache in place and config files or
will they be =
overwritten during the make commands?

Only existing binaries and documentation gets replaced.

Existing cache is not touched until squid starts. Then some pieces get upgraded during normal operation.

Existing config is not touched, new config files should get added as/if needed.

Amos
--
Please be using
  Current Stable Squid 2.7.STABLE9 or 3.1.5



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Samba]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Linux USB]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux