On 09.07.10 11:14, sameer khan wrote: > thank for repy matus. I am not trying to cache large object in coss, > it is max limit to 100000. Want to achieve is best hit ratio. request hit ratio or byte hit ratio? Those two are different. > I am guessing if the cache size is too small it will > have effect on hit ratio. of course. But If you will have too big COSS cache_dir, it may hold small objects for a long time, and there will be no place for (a)ufs/diskd to hold big objects. Since big objects tend to take more place, you may find out that you have small byte-hit ratio even if high request hit ratio. > As there are many small objects, i want to cache them in > coss and reset in aufs. So if i use more than one coss directory > on the same drive, is it also not recommended (as with aufs) or it is > ok if i do that. there's no use for that. and as I said, you apparently need less data for COSS, not more. > Does any one know upper limit of squid's request per sec. As my squid box > is working perfectly for ~350 request per sec. But it slows down on ~600 > request per sec. any suggestion will be much appreciated. it mostly depends on the HW. you can tune the SW to hold up to SW/HW possibilities. > I am using browser, i dont think i can limit it to 72 line. So doing it > manually. it's apparently the webmail (hotmail issue)... well, microsoft is very "good" at ignoring good practices -- Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uhlar@xxxxxxxxxxx ; http://www.fantomas.sk/ Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address. Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu. Emacs is a complicated operating system without good text editor.
