Thank you very much
Matus UHLAR
and Henrik
Henrik K wrote:
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 08:39:07AM +0200, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On 24.06.10 10:05, senthilkumaar2021 wrote:
In order to use Anti virus scanning with Squid proxy which one is
suitable whether C-ICAP with ClamAV or HAVP with ClamAv.We are having
request rate around 300-350 re/sec.Which one will handle more requests
with ease?We have made some basic tests and it seems c-icap will handle
more requests.
then it's apparently true. and I found that more feasdible than using any
kind of parent caches for squid
HAVP is not very optimized in it's architecture, sadly no one has time to
improve it. ICAP certainly is the easier choice and more manageable for such
rates. For lesser rates HAVP does have it's advantages.
http://www.squid-cache.org/mail-archive/squid-users/201003/0400.html
