tor 2010-05-27 klockan 18:38 +0000 skrev GIGO .: > Related to my earlier query regarding how to handle reports with > multiple instances. The problem was that inst1access.log though track > client activities correctly however give incorrect information > regarding the in-cache returned objects.As the caching part is instead > being done by Instance-2. So the SARG reports (parsing of > inst1access.log) wrongly depicts about objects returned from the > cache..... Any reason why not run the reports on instance-2 logs? > Now i just thought an idea that may be pointing to the same cache will > solve the problem if instance 1 has no-store option set. Please read > below and guide me i would be thankful Two Squid processes can not share the same cache_dir, not even with one in read-only mode. Regards Henirk
