On 20-5-2010 8:22, Henrik Nordström wrote: > ons 2010-05-19 klockan 22:22 +0200 skrev Angelo Höngens: > >> http://wiki.squid-cache.org/SquidFaq/InnerWorkings >> >> "The proper way to deal with Set-Cookie reply headers, according to RFC >> 2109 is to cache the whole object, EXCEPT the Set-Cookie header lines." > > Wrong reference. > > This is from the original Netscape Cookie specification. At that time > Cache-Control did not exists. So if I understand you correctly, squid follows the behaviour dictated in the Netscape Cookie Specification (undated), which says set-cookie headers should never be cached. However, that was superseded by rfc2109 (1997), which says they should be cached unless told not to. So by that reasoning, I would say Squid does not follow rfc. Not that I care that much, but perhaps it would warrant an update in the documentation or the faq page? -- With kind regards, Angelo Höngens systems administrator MCSE on Windows 2003 MCSE on Windows 2000 MS Small Business Specialist ------------------------------------------ NetMatch tourism internet software solutions Ringbaan Oost 2b 5013 CA Tilburg +31 (0)13 5811088 +31 (0)13 5821239 A.Hongens@xxxxxxxxxxx www.netmatch.nl ------------------------------------------
