Isn't it irrelevant if it implements range requests with the fs= parameter? With the fs= parameter it becomes a unique URI and squid should treat it as a separate object even if it does have a Content-Range header. Do we know enough to be sure this is a squid bug or should I be contacting RedTube and YouPorn to fix their broken code? -----Original Message----- From: Mark Nottingham [mailto:mnot@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] Sent: Friday, April 09, 2010 7:35 PM To: Henrik Nordström Cc: Amos Jeffries; squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: Squid 3.1.1 and flash video scrubbing On 09/04/2010, at 9:05 PM, Henrik Nordström wrote: > We don't know how the server would react on Range requests to this > ranged fs=.. object. Maybe it imlpements them, maybe it don't. RED says it doesn't. -- Mark Nottingham mnot@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
