Search squid archive

Re: Cache_dir size considerations

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



GIGO . ha scritto:
Dear All,
Relevant info: On IBM Server 3650 x series with physical RAID 1 . Disk space comprises of 70 Gb Intended is caching of windows update.
intended is caching of youtube contents.
Single is dedicated to running squid on Ubuntu 8.04
Current Settings : cache_dir aufs /usr/local/squid/var/cache 50000 16 256
However i beleived that it should be changed to something like this: cache_dir aufs /usr/local/squid/var/cache 50gb 48 768
or cache_dir aufs /usr/local/squid/var/cache 20000 32 512..... etc etc. so that not more file lies in L2. The confusion is that isnt it correct to allocating this large 50gb hard-disk space to caching? Does such large cache will result in some issues? Does this large size has to do with some latency issue etc? I am looking forward for your guidance. regards@all


50gb cache is handled by squid just fine.
I'm not an expert, but I'm using 16 256 for a 40gb cache and I don't see any issues. IME before changing values without a deep understanding of the technicalities involved, it's safer to stick with the defaults.

Also, you don't specify the amount of RAM of the server nor the value of cache_mem parameter.

_________________________________________________________________
Hotmail: Free, trusted and rich email service.
https://signup.live.com/signup.aspx?id=60969


--
Marcello Romani

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Samba]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Linux USB]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux