Le Mercredi 10 Février 2010 16:07:17, Amos Jeffries a écrit : > On Wed, 10 Feb 2010 10:51:16 -0600, Luis Daniel Lucio Quiroz > > <luis.daniel.lucio@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Le Mardi 9 Février 2010 22:57:58, Amos Jeffries a écrit : > >> Henrik Nordström wrote: > >> > tis 2010-02-09 klockan 15:18 -0600 skrev Luis Daniel Lucio Quiroz: > >> >> Le Mercredi 30 Juillet 2008 22:24:35, Henrik Nordstrom a écrit : > >> >>> On tor, 2008-07-31 at 11:26 +0900, S.KOBAYASHI wrote: > >> >>>> Hello developer, > >> >>>> > >> >>>> I'm looking for the evidence for accessing ICAP server. Is there > > its > > >> >>>> log in any log files such as access.log, cache.log? > >> >>> > >> >>> The ICAP server should have logs of it's own. > >> >>> > >> >>> There is no information in the Squid logs on which iCAP servers > > were > > >> >>> used for the request/response. > >> >>> > >> >>> Regards > >> >>> Henrik > >> >> > >> >> I wonder if using squidclient mngr:xxXX we could see some info > > about > > >> >> icap, where? > >> > > >> > Seems not. > >> > > >> > You can however increase the debug level of section 93 to have ICAP > >> > spew > >> > out lots of information in cache.log. > >> > > >> > debug_options ALL,1 93,5 > >> > > >> > should do the trick I think. > >> > > >> > Regards > >> > Henrik > >> > >> Squid-3.1 and later provide some little ICAP service logging in > >> access.log. > >> http://www.squid-cache.org/Doc/config/logformat/ > >> > >> > >> Amos > > > > Do you think we could backport that logging in access.log capabilitie. > > I > > > may > > do that but just tellme what file to > > backport. > > > > TIA > > > > LD > > It was quite a major change. For only a small benefit. It won't be done > upstream sorry. > > 3.1 is out as stable in less than 60 days though if everything goes to > plan. > (one blocker bug to go. Major, but solo). > > Amos Thanx Amos, some strategic questions. how status of sq 3.1 is about: - ICAP support - SSLbump - ESI - Reverse proxy I'd like to use ESI support to log some html payload of specifique sites. As far as I know, sslbump will help avoidme to inverse-proxying any site. I'm mandriva squid maintainer and as far as i know, we will freze distro about april 2010. Do you thing 3.1 will be out by april? What kind of block bug are you talking about. TIA LD
