> fre 2010-02-19 klockan 03:08 -0200 skrev H: > >> Thing is, all three as parent with no-query round-robin get equal load as >> supposed, but, giving one (any) of them weight=2 makes no difference, still >> gets the same load. > > How much traffic do you have? 10Mbit/s plus 8Mbit/s on each parent cache > >> So I thought doing this >> >> cache_peer parent_IP parent tport uport no-query [weight=2] >> cache_peer parent_IP parent tport uport no-query round-robin >> cache_peer parent_IP parent tport uport no-query round-robin > > The peers all need to be configured equal except for the weight. > > For non-ICP/HTCP peers only round-robin has a definition of weight. The > other peering types all select just one or a ordered list.. well, it was a try since weight does not weight ... btw, the above problem (not weighting) applies to icp as well > > Correct. Siblings are only sharing cache, not uplink. What differs a > sibling from a parent. > ok, but then this # use 'allow-miss' to disable Squid's use of only-if-cached when forwarding requests to siblings. eventually needs better explanation/clarification and the returned erro needs revision because it comes up ERR_ACCESS_DENIED and should be better ERR_ONLY_IF_CACHED_MISS H (17)8111.3300
