On Wed, 23 Dec 2009 15:10:34 -0800
Manjusha Maddala <mmaddala25@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> >From squid.conf,
> refresh_pattern . 21600 100% 21600 override-expire
>
> That is, a cached page is fresh if its age in cache < 15 days
> (21600=15*24*60).
not quite, an object without an explicit expiry time, but that can be
validated, could be stale in less than 15 days.
see override-lastmod
> I noticed that sending HTTP requests to pages older than 30 days
> result in TCP_REFRESH_MISS while requests for pages cached in the
> last 30 days either result in TCP_HIT or TCP_MISS. Since the min time
> for refresh_pattern is 15days, shouldn't it be like pages older than
> 15days should be validated against the parent
> (REFRESH_MISS/REFRESH_HIT) while all other pages are either TCP_HIT
> or TCP_MISS. How did the limit change from 15 to 30? Has anybody else
> seen such an anamoly?
It's not an anomally - from the sample squid.conf file:
override-expire enforces min age even if the server
sent an explicit expiry time
...
Note: this does not enforce staleness - it only extends
freshness / min. If the server returns a Expires time which
is longer than your max time, Squid will still consider
the object fresh for that period of time.
> Also, if there's no refresh_pattern matching a URI, how would Squid
> process that HTTP request? Would it get a fresh copy from the parent
> or will it return the cached copy?
Presumably the heuristic algorithm for freshness would be disabled
and anything without an explicit expiry time would be stale. It's not
really a sensible thing to do though.
>
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
> =======================
> This email message and any attachments are for the exclusive use of
> the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged
> information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or
> distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient,
> please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of
> the original message along with any attachments, from your computer
> system. If you are the intended recipient, please be advised that
> the content of this message is subject to access, review and
> disclosure by the sender's Email System Administrator.
>
