Hi, I need some hardware/software suggestions for TPROXY servers. We're an ISP and have been trialling Squid for a while on an assorted collection of spare hardware. (We've got some Dell 2950 running VMware and iSCSI, also Dell 2970 with VMware and SAS HDD, also HP DL360-G5 non-VMware with SAS HDD). All these servers have been working pretty well, but we now need to work out a budget to buy proper dedicated gear. We have some POPs which have about 5000 cable modems. Cisco routers running WCCP feed groups of Squid 3.1 / TPROXY servers. At the moment we have 3 to 4 sibling no-cache servers at each POP. We currently deal with HTTP traffic of about 150Mbps but would like to dimension the new gear to support double this. What are peoples opinions on what sort of hardware to use? Maybe groups of mid-size servers be best? I was thinking along the lines of : Eg HP DL360/380-G6, 1 x 2.4Ghz quad core, 32Gb RAM, 4 x 15K 146Gb HDD Or should we be looking at just using one larger server : Eg HP DL380-G6, 1 x 2.4Ghz (or faster) quad core, 64Gb RAM, 8 x 15K 146Gb HDD When buying HDDs for these servers, you can choose between 2.5" and 3.5" drives. Should there be much difference in performance between the two? I see the 3.5" version of 15K's are quite a bit cheaper and also are available in sizes > 146Gb There are choices for the disk controller. Eg HP lets you choose between 256M, 512M, 1G RAM on the supplied P410i RAID card. We wouldn't be running any RAID, but would extra RAM on the card still be helpful with speeding up disk access for squid? Dell R610/R710 seems pretty similar to the HP DL360/380. But with the Dell you have to buy dual quad core, which seems a bit wasteful for squid? (unless you were going try and dice the server up to run multiple squids under VMware). Probably best to save a few $$ and stick with 1 x CPU and put extra cash towards more RAM or disk? Or do you think VMware is an OK way to make use of all the CPU's? On our trial servers the VMware ESXi seems to work OK but in the back of my mind I worry about the extra overhead it introduces. Thanks for any feedback you might have! Michael.
