Search squid archive

Re: 1024 file descriptors is good

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Thanks I found it this solution and in this moment works very well for increase the max-descriptors.

The original problem was in my firewall, in this moment I have the proxy with Squid 3.0STABLE19 on RHEL5.4 works Ok.

Thanks for all.

Luis Daniel Lucio Quiroz wrote:
Le mardi 20 octobre 2009 16:04:16, Leonardo Rodrigues a écrit :
Mariel Sebedio escreveu:
Hi, I have a RHEL 5.4 with squid3.0STABLE19 and have a performance
problems...

My cache.log not report warning

When I see in cachemgr.cgi I just have a 1024 File descriptors...
    if you're not getting the famous WARNING in your cache.log

WARNING! Your cache is running out of filedescriptors

    then you really dont need to worry about 1024 FDs. That's now too
much, but that's pretty enough for having a good number of simultaneos
clients.

    Filedescriptors problems (running low on them) could give you some
problems, but in any case you would see the warning on your logs. If
you're not seeing it, then problem is not filedescriptor related. And if
that's not filedescriptor related, raising it wont change anything.

    your performance problem is somewhere else .....


I did fix that with this method:
/etc/security/limits.conf:
*               -       nofile          131072

and configure with --with-filedescriptors=8192

numbers are just a try, but you must set both of them higher than 1024. After that I get this error rid.

LD




--
Lic. Mariel Sebedio
Division Computos y Sistemas
Tel (02944)-445400 int 2307
INVAP S.E. - www.invap.com.ar


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Samba]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Linux USB]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux