Henrik Nordstrom <henrik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> escribió:
tor 2009-11-05 klockan 15:48 +1300 skrev Amos Jeffries:
On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 14:55:09 -0300, Guido Marino Lorenzutti
<glorenzutti@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi people: Can someone explain to me why some of the values of memory
> usage are negative? Is this bad or bug?
32-bit signed/unsigned bug. Fixed in later releases.
Sure?
last time I looked at this it's due to mallinfo() breakage, only
supporting 32-bit signed values... which means garbage on any process
larger than ca 2GB.
Even confirmed by glibc developers as a wontfix issue, declaring
mallinfo a dead end not worth fixing, but still no other better
alternative available..
Regards
Henrik
Common... don't tell me this..
So then this isn't a bug?
If it is a bug, in which version it works?
