On Wed, 14 Oct 2009 00:33:58 -0400, Ross Kovelman <rkovelman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Sounds good, but what if this is for all sites? I was only testing > Facbook, > Myspace, CNN, etc. I did not go to you tube at all. > > Thanks YouTube bit is irrelevant ... > >> From: Chudy Fernandez <chudy_fernandez@xxxxxxxxx> >> Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2009 21:26:42 -0700 (PDT) >> To: Ross Kovelman <rkovelman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> Subject: Re: error: url_rewriter >> >> about the concurrency this will give you the idea. >> http://wiki.squid-cache.org/ConfigExamples/DynamicContent/YouTube/Discussion >> The better reference is: http://wiki.squid-cache.org/Features/Redirectors#How_do_I_make_it_concurrent.3F >> >> ----- Original Message ---- >>> From: Ross Kovelman <rkovelman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>> To: Chudy Fernandez <chudy_fernandez@xxxxxxxxx>; >>> "squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>> Sent: Wed, October 14, 2009 12:21:57 PM >>> Subject: Re: error: url_rewriter >>> >>> This is what I have related to "children" >>> >>> redirect_children 1 The redirect_* options are obsolete. They are now re-named to url_rewrite_* That should now be "url_rewrite_children 1" though 5 is the default and you may want to use that. Amos >>> auth_param basic children 5 >>> >>> Thanks >>> >>>> From: Chudy Fernandez >>>> Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2009 20:49:50 -0700 (PDT) >>>> To: Ross Kovelman >>>> Subject: Re: error: url_rewriter >>>> >>>> 2 ways to solve thats increase children or >>>> change your rewriter to accept parallel and increase >>>> concurrency.(which is >>>> better) >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> ----- Original Message ---- >>>>> From: Ross Kovelman >>>>> To: "squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" >>>>> Sent: Wed, October 14, 2009 11:18:07 AM >>>>> Subject: error: url_rewriter >>>>> >>>>> Hello, >>>>> I have an error showing: >>>>> 2009/10/13 22:41:05| WARNING: All url_rewriter processes are busy. >>>>> 2009/10/13 22:41:05| WARNING: up to 1 pending requests queued >>>>> 2009/10/13 22:43:22| WARNING: All url_rewriter processes are busy. >>>>> 2009/10/13 22:43:22| WARNING: up to 6 pending requests queued >>>>> 2009/10/13 22:43:22| Consider increasing the number of url_rewriter >>>>> processes to at least 7 in your config file. >>>>> 2009/10/13 22:43:54| WARNING: All url_rewriter processes are busy. >>>>> 2009/10/13 22:43:54| WARNING: up to 1 pending requests queued >>>>> 2009/10/13 22:43:54| Consider increasing the number of url_rewriter >>>>> processes to at least 2 in your config file. >>>>> 2009/10/13 22:44:42| WARNING: All url_rewriter processes are busy. >>>>> 2009/10/13 22:44:42| WARNING: up to 3 pending requests queued >>>>> 2009/10/13 22:44:42| Consider increasing the number of url_rewriter >>>>> processes to at least 4 in your config file. >>>>> 2009/10/13 23:11:16| WARNING: All url_rewriter processes are busy. >>>>> 2009/10/13 23:11:16| WARNING: up to 1 pending requests queued >>>>> >>>>> How do I resolve this? I saw some things from the list and on other >>>>> websites but those people had a lot more people accessing the server >>>>> then I >>>>> do. I am on squid 2.7 >>>>> >>>>> Thanks >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >> >> >> >>
