Search squid archive

Re: error: url_rewriter

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> From: Amos Jeffries <squid3@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 16:56:35 +1300
> To: "squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re:  error: url_rewriter
> 
> On Tue, 13 Oct 2009 23:18:07 -0400, Ross Kovelman
> <rkovelman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Hello,
>> I have an error showing:
>> 2009/10/13 22:41:05| WARNING: All url_rewriter processes are busy.
>> 2009/10/13 22:41:05| WARNING: up to 1 pending requests queued
>> 2009/10/13 22:43:22| WARNING: All url_rewriter processes are busy.
>> 2009/10/13 22:43:22| WARNING: up to 6 pending requests queued
>> 2009/10/13 22:43:22| Consider increasing the number of url_rewriter
>> processes to at least 7 in your config file.
>> 2009/10/13 22:43:54| WARNING: All url_rewriter processes are busy.
>> 2009/10/13 22:43:54| WARNING: up to 1 pending requests queued
>> 2009/10/13 22:43:54| Consider increasing the number of url_rewriter
>> processes to at least 2 in your config file.
>> 2009/10/13 22:44:42| WARNING: All url_rewriter processes are busy.
>> 2009/10/13 22:44:42| WARNING: up to 3 pending requests queued
>> 2009/10/13 22:44:42| Consider increasing the number of url_rewriter
>> processes to at least 4 in your config file.
>> 2009/10/13 23:11:16| WARNING: All url_rewriter processes are busy.
>> 2009/10/13 23:11:16| WARNING: up to 1 pending requests queued
>> 
>> How do I resolve this?  I saw some things from the list and on other
>> websites but those people had a lot more people accessing the server
> then I
>> do.  I am on squid 2.7
> 
> They also probably had dozens of helpers running. You have precisely one
> by the looks of it.
> 
> You have hit the same problem anyway. The solutions are the same.
> 
>  * find out if the re-writer is working too slowly and might be sped up.
>  * follow Squids advice and up the number of running helpers.
>  * add some url_rewrite_access rules to bypass re-writer for requests when
> its not actually needed.
> 
> Amos

Amos,
Thanks again!  Although the limited searching I have done can you point me
in the direction to find out to bring up the re-writer and its speed?  Yes I
am only running 1.  Also the url_rewrite_access, wouldn't I want all
websites to be checked against the ACL list?  Or am I reading this wrong:
Used to define the access lists specifies which requests are sent to the
redirector processes.

Thanks



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Samba]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Linux USB]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux