Search squid archive

Re: Squid-3.1 behaving differently from 2.7.x?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



mån 2009-10-12 klockan 16:48 +0200 skrev Ralf Hildebrandt:
> * Amos Jeffries <squid3@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> > Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> > >I'm running squid in this setup:
> > >
> > >client -> squid -> dansguardian -> squid -> teh interwebs
> > >
> > >When using 2.7-STABLE-7 for both squid instances, I saw about 100
> > >dansguardian processes. Today, after switching both to 3.1.0.14, I'm
> > >seeing a constant 252 dansguardian processes (the maximum).
> > >
> > >Is squid-3.1 somehow "keeping connections open" to it's parent?
> > >
> > 
> > Looks that way.  The defaults for persistent connections have not
> > changed between 2.x and 3.x though AFAIK.
> 
> Hm. So did 2.7.x use persisten connections?

Yes.

But bug #2451 made it drop the upstream connections a bit too often...
fixed in 2.7.STABLE7.

Regards
Henrik


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Samba]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Linux USB]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux