On 29.09.09 02:20, tookers wrote: > Why not make use of some of your RAM for cache_mem? It will make requests > for smaller, more frequently requested files a hell of a lot quicker, and it > should give you a better hit ratio. mostly because we weren't sure if his RAM will be enough for the cache index... > # 3GB process size limit in 32bit, so don't set higher than 1 GB for a very > busy cache > cache_mem 512 MB > maximum_object_size_in_memory 2048 KB I would set those lower, maybue 128M/128K > A few refresh_patterns to get images and other static content in cache for > longer:- > > refresh_pattern \.jpg$ 3600 50% 60 ignore-reload > refresh_pattern \.gif$ 3600 50% 60 ignore-reload > refresh_pattern \.css$ 3600 50% 60 ignore-reload > refresh_pattern \.js$ 3600 50% 60 ignore-reload > > # Cache all html for 5 minutes > refresh_pattern \.html$ 300 50% 10 ignore-reload ignore-reload may cause problems for clients. I strongly discourage using that. Better skip those refresh_patterns, for now se can use defaults. -- Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uhlar@xxxxxxxxxxx ; http://www.fantomas.sk/ Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address. Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu. (R)etry, (A)bort, (C)ancer
