> mån 2009-09-14 klockan 16:07 +0200 skrev Matus UHLAR - fantomas: > > btw, why it isn't possible to use authentication on the same port as > > "transparent" proxy? Couldn't squid detect if to use authentication just > > from finding out if the connection was redirected or not? On 15.09.09 01:21, Henrik Nordstrom wrote: > The last part is unfortunately non-trivial on some OS:es where > getsockname returns the original destination with no indication that the > request was intercepted. So we assume that all requests arriving on an > intercept flagged port is intercepted. original? Don't you mean the current destination, e.g. our local http port? > Why do you need both on the same port? You can have as many plenty of > different http_port settings in the same Squid which means that there is > absolutely no need of using the same port both for interception and > proxy configuration. Just set up another "random" http_port and change > your interception rules to direct intercepted traffic there.. I don't need it, i was only wondering about that. -- Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uhlar@xxxxxxxxxxx ; http://www.fantomas.sk/ Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address. Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu. Support bacteria - they're the only culture some people have.
