On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 4:53 AM, Henrik Nordstrom <henrik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > mån 2009-09-14 klockan 15:08 +0100 skrev Genaro Flores: > >> Ah, thanks. I reckon there have been no changes since I last asked the >> question. Although 'purge' does look promising (except for efficiency and >> that I doubt it can do anything to decrease the time required to perform >> multiple queries). > > This is because there is no searchable index with the data you look for. > So each object has to be opened to find the exact properties. > > The Squid cache index is keyed on an MD5 hash of the URL (16 bytes > "random" data), not even preserving the requested hostname in a > meaningful manner. > > Regards > Henrik > > Henrik, Yes, the squid process is running and there is no problem. I don't see anything fishy in the cache.log either. I post the contents of cache.log soon. Avinash
