> mån 2009-08-17 klockan 10:28 +0200 skrev Matus UHLAR - fantomas: > > > Is there any problem with current scheme where they are cached by underlying > > OS' cache? On 17.08.09 23:36, Henrik Nordstrom wrote: > Yes, there is a big difference in latency and CPU usage for very hot > objects, at least unless you use the ufs cache_dir type which on the > other hand scales badly with I/O if you have stuff which is not in the > OS cache.. so you expect it to be mostly usefull on ufs cache_dirs? OK, let's see if it gives us any performance improvement(s). -- Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uhlar@xxxxxxxxxxx ; http://www.fantomas.sk/ Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address. Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu. LSD will make your ECS screen display 16.7 million colors
