Search squid archive

Re: R: aufs vs ufs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: R: aufs vs ufs
From: Henrik Nordstrom <henrik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 09:48:11 +0200
Cc: squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <0BD08FAE084B43468F273DAB0389F39F@RIC>
References: <0BD08FAE084B43468F273DAB0389F39F@RIC>

tor 2009-08-13 klockan 08:40 +0200 skrev Riccardo Castellani:
> I'm using Debian 5.0.1, but what fs do you suggest me for cache_dir ?
> 
> aufs or ufs ?

aufs, as ufs performs very badly under load.

Regards
Henrik

References:
- R: aufs vs ufs
  - From: Riccardo Castellani

Prev by Date: R: aufs vs ufs
Next by Date: Re: caching dynamic image content
Previous by thread: R: aufs vs ufs
Next by thread: Terminal Server Users
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Audio Users] [Samba] [Big List of Linux Books] [Linux USB] [Yosemite News]

Powered by Linux