No, it is not. It may be 1mbps .OR. 76GB for week. it can't be anything
"per second for week". You may mean 1mbps during weekdays, 1mbps during
the whole week, 1mbps average.
I want to say if weekly average of http traffic is 1 Mbps (monitored by mrtg
tools), all http traffic, which goes to my squid, is 76 GB in a week.
infact mrtg gives me these information:
maximum peak for day
traffic average for day
...for week
...for month
Do you understand my calculates ?
ok, are your child caches configured as neighbours to each other?
both squid (B,C) have configured as parent cache squid A
I don't know what means "configured as neighbours to each other". Do you
reference B as neighbours to C ?!
----- Original Message -----
From: "Matus UHLAR - fantomas" <uhlar@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, June 30, 2009 10:10 AM
Subject: Re: R: [squid-users] cache size and structure
>> excuse me, 1 megabit per second for a week, so :
>> 1 Mb *60*60*24*7=604.800 / 8 = 75.600 MB about 76 GB traffic for
>> week.
>> I'm refering both inbound and outbound traffic (1 Mbps in , 1 Mbps
>> out).
>Well, that is just one megabit per second. That is the link bandwidth,
>it's
>irelevant to provide different interval, you are just confusing us (or
>at
>least me). We can count how much does that make for a day, week, month,
>year
>...
On 30.06.09 09:51, Riccardo Castellani wrote:
Matus Uhlar,
Skip private replies please! I am not subscribed to the list to receive
private squid-related mail.
my internet link bandwidth is about 10 Mbps and I'm monitoring (by mrtg)
traffic usage of my Squid parent (A), which is about 1 Mbps for a week
(so
76 GB data traffic for a week).
No, it is not. It may be 1mbps .OR. 76GB for week. it can't be anything
"per second for week". You may mean 1mbps during weekdays, 1mbps during
the whole week, 1mbps average.
I have also 2 squid chileds (B,C) which
communicate to squid A. Some user groups use Squid A, others use Squid B
and
others use Squid C.
1 Mbps
>so, some users access directly your squid?
yes
ok, are your child caches configured as neighbours to each other?
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uhlar@xxxxxxxxxxx ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
Windows 2000: 640 MB ought to be enough for anybody
