Search squid archive

Re: Scalability in serving large ammount of concurrent requests

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hey,

On Sat, May 2, 2009 at 4:24 PM, Jeff Pang <pangj@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> We use Squid for reverse proxy for the popular webmail here, serving for
> static resources like images/css/JS etc. Totally 24 squid boxes, each has
> the concurrent connections more than 20,000. For small static objects, Squid
> has much higher performance than Apache.
>
> But as I once submitted a message on the list, Squid can't get high traffic
> passed through. I never saw Squid box has the traffic flow to reach
> 200Mbits/Sec. While in some cases lighttpd (epoll + multi-processes) can get
> much higher traffic than Squid.

So did you tried Apache/Lighty + mod_proxy ?

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Samba]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Linux USB]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux