On 27.04.09 16:41, Pandu E Poluan wrote: > Ah, thanks for the explanation. > > One thing is still unclear for me, though: Why is it not a good idea to > have 2+ cache on same disk? > > In my understanding (CMIIW), aufs is better for larger objects while > coss is better for smaller objects (or the other way around). Yes, but if you have enough of disk space, you can put those on different disks. This rule mostly applied to two cache_dirs of type *ufs/diskd in which case it's useless and can slow squid down. -- Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uhlar@xxxxxxxxxxx ; http://www.fantomas.sk/ Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address. Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu. "Where do you want to go to die?" [Microsoft]
