Search squid archive

Re: multiple disks for cache storage

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Graham Dixon wrote:
Gd morning all,
I have noticed in some (at least one) recent postings with description
of a system which included only one large disk media.
Some time ago when I first explored the pleasures of building my own
proxy I learnt that better performance could be obtained from the
technology of the time by building the cache storage on a disk system
seperate from the OS, and logs, and built with multiple small disks.
With advances in disk technology does such a concept still apply ?
Or do larger disk caches, higher access rates and other improvements
mean that such tricks to reduce average seek times for cache reads are
less important on busy machines.

cheers
Graham

AFAIK, the many small disks model still provides faster disk times than the single large media.

The purchasing trend though seems to be towards fewer, bigger or cheaper media. I've no idea if the newer disk improvements outperform multiple older disks though. So the performance loss may not be as bad as it seems.

Amos
--
Please be using
  Current Stable Squid 2.7.STABLE6 or 3.0.STABLE14
  Current Beta Squid 3.1.0.7

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Samba]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Linux USB]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux