Search squid archive

Re: Squid daily releases

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 01:52:58PM +1200, Amos Jeffries wrote:
> > Using 3.1.0.6
> >
> > What has changed between 0308 and today?
> >
> > I compiled today's release and got no access complains and had to switch
> > back
> > to 20090308?
> >
> > What happened?
> 
> Sorry about that. We can only assure that is builds. The run-time behavior
> is not as well auto-tested as we would like. (volunteers for adding unit
> tests?)
> 
> Quite a lot of code shuffling is going on this month. Some of it is
> bringing out C++ linkage oddities. The worst of them are hitting 3.HEAD,
> but some has leaked into 3.1 snapshots.
> 
> We are working really hard on locating all of the current issues and
> fixing/testing in HEAD before porting the results back to 3.1.
> 
> Amos
> 
>

I understand however 08 to 25 is about 17 itereations.

Unlike OPenSLL and INN which I grab the daily releases,
I have not incorporated this into squid.

The problem was that remote client could not proxy yesterday when
I grabbed the 20090325 package and 
that forced me to switch back to 3.0.1.6 - 20080308 .

 
> 
> -- 
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> believed to be clean.
> 

-- 
Member - Liberal International	This is doctor@xxxxxxxxxx
Ici doctor@xxxxxxxxxx God, Queen and country! Beware Anti-Christ rising!
Never Satan President Republic!
Point to http://tv.cityonahillproductions.com/ 

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Samba]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Linux USB]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux