Search squid archive

Re: Why so many 304 resposne for MSIE ?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



howard chen wrote:
Why so many 304 resposne for MSIE ?

I am serving a static JS file, with Squid as reverse proxy to my
Apache 1.x, which has the following response to the client:

=================

Status=OK - 200
Last-Modified=Thu, 11 Oct 2007 05:04:34 GMT
Accept-Ranges=bytes
Content-Length=27157
Content-Type=application/x-javascript
Date=Tue, 20 Jan 2009 02:36:50 GMT
Expires=Fri, 30 Jan 2009 02:36:50 GMT
Cache-Control=max-age=864000
Age=14
X-Cache=HIT from webcache-1.example.com
Connection=keep-alive


=================

You see expire is set to 10 years from now, so I will expect only a
very little of 304 (only user press F5 to reload)

However, by tracing the squid log, I found


The number of reqs of 200 vs 304 on IE:

17785 (200)
12465 (304)

The number of reqs of 200 vs 304 on FF:

6507 (200)
333 (304)

You see? Why so many 304 resposne for MSIE ?


Any idea?

Thanks.

You'll most likely have to Ask Microsoft for that answer.

Could be IE users hitting a bug in their GUI, and having to refresh the page manually.

Amos
--
Please be using
  Current Stable Squid 2.7.STABLE5 or 3.0.STABLE11
  Current Beta Squid 3.1.0.3

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Samba]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Linux USB]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux