Search squid archive

RE: ICP is not working as expected

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Thank you

Would you please share with you a configuration example for two squid servers running behind hardware NLB switch where they use ICP and sibling relation, one of the two server is the origin for both

Regards 

Atef A. M. AlQashqish
Operation Manager / MCSE, MCT, ITIL Certified Service Manager


-----Original Message-----
From: Amos Jeffries [mailto:squid3@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Sunday, January 18, 2009 1:34 PM
To: Atef Alqashqish
Cc: squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re:  ICP is not working as expected

Atef Alqashqish wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I have two servers Windows 2003 with SQUID 2.7 stable 3, one of them act as origin for the two squid instances, hence one squid installation co-exist on the same box with IIS application and web site, the two squid works as expected as long as ICP and cache hierarchy is not used, only one cache_peer as parent and origin.
> 
> To enhance the site performance we decide to use ICP and make one server use the second server squid as its sibling with proxy-only option, we always get ICP_MISS in the cache log even though we are sure the URL is cached in  the first SQUID cache!, the below are the configuration:
> 

First off 'proxy-only' is probably not a good choice in these 
circumstances. It prevents any sibling fetched objects being cached, yet 
you are caching objects direct from the parent. You _want_ the fastest 
possible response in an accelerator, which means caching.


Secondly you are not doing a clear accelerator. For your cofiguration 
below to work, something funky has to be going one with either DNS or 
URL re-writers which breaks any possibility of siblingship.

See below for a description of the problem.

See 
http://wiki.squid-cache.org/SquidFaq/ReverseProxy#head-7fa129a6528d9a5c914f8dd5671668173e39e341
  for a demo config of how accelerators should be configured.

> Server1 (Origin with IIS site and SQUID cache), IP 10.10.0.191:
> cache_peer 10.11.0.197 parent 80 0 no-query originserver
> acl usasite dstdomain 10.10.0.191

You sure clients are really asking for "http://10.10.0.191/"; ??

> cache_peer_access 10.11.0.197 allow usasite
> cache_peer_access 10.11.0.197 deny all
> http_access allow usasite
> 
> icp_port 3130
> icp_access allow all
> 
> Server2(IP 10.10.10.16):
> http_port 10.10.10.16:80 accel defaultsite=10.10.10.16

So your domain name is not "10.10.0.191" but "10.10.10.16" now?

> cache_peer 10.10.0.191 sibling 80 3130 proxy-only 
> cache_peer 10.11.0.197 parent 80 0 no-query originserver
> acl usasite dstdomain 10.10.10.16

Must be, but the sibling Server1 doesn't know or accept the domain name 
when asked for "http://10.10.10.16/";

> cache_peer_access 10.11.0.197 allow usasite
> cache_peer_access 10.11.0.197 deny all
> cache_peer_access 10.10.0.191 allow usasite
> cache_peer_access 10.10.0.191 deny all
> http_access allow usasite
> 
> icp_port 3130
> icp_access allow all
> 
> Please help
> 
> Atef A. M. AlQashqish
> Operation Manager / MCSE, MCT, ITIL Certified Service Manager
> iHorizons 
> Tel : -         +962 6 534 1640 ext 61
> Mobile:-     +962 777 530053
> Fax:-         +962 6 534 1927
> P.O. BOX 1610 Jubaiha 11941 Amman - Jordan
> http://www.iHorizons.com 
> 
> 

Amos
-- 
Please be using
   Current Stable Squid 2.7.STABLE5 or 3.0.STABLE11
   Current Beta Squid 3.1.0.3




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Samba]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Linux USB]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux