If you are doing transparent interception, where the client HTTP requests
are being silently forwarded to the squid on the router, this should not be
a problem, as Windows Firewall will not see anything different than HTTP
traffic without a proxy.
Regards
HASSAN
----- Original Message -----
From: "Paul Cocker" <paul.cocker@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2008 20:59
Subject: squid & Windows Firewall
We're looking to roll out the Windows Firewall on our clients. I cannot
imagine that squid is relevant to this equation as all communication is
done by the client and initiated by the client and done via a browser,
but are there any potential "gotchas!" here? Are we more likely to see
timeouts for slow response web servers for example?
I feel silly for asking, but better safe than sorry I guess.
Paul Cocker
TNT Post is the trading name for TNT Post UK Ltd (company number: 04417047),
TNT Post (Doordrop Media) Ltd (00613278), TNT Post Scotland Ltd (05695897),
TNT Post North Ltd (05701709), TNT Post South West Ltd (05983401), TNT Post
Midlands Limited (6458167)and TNT Post London Limited (6493826). Emma's
Diary and Lifecycle are trading names for Lifecycle Marketing (Mother and
Baby) Ltd (02556692). All companies are registered in England and Wales;
registered address: 1 Globeside Business Park, Fieldhouse Lane, Marlow,
Buckinghamshire, SL7 1HY.
