Search squid archive

RE: Performance problems with 2.6.STABLE18

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Thanks, Kinkie.

The version that I'm running contains a couple of minor modifications,
so as a first pass I'd rather get the 2.6 version working, rather than
go through a repatch.

I tried running under valgrind, and it found a couple of leaks, but I'm
not sure that those are strictly the problem. If it were a "traditional"
memory leak, where memory was just wandering off, I don't quite see why
the CPU would climb along with the memory usage.

Mark.



-----Original Message-----
From: Kinkie [mailto:gkinkie@xxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2008 4:50 PM
To: Mark Kent
Cc: squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re:  Performance problems with 2.6.STABLE18

On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 4:24 PM, Mark Kent <mkent@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
>
>  Hi,
>
>  I'm currently having a performance issue with Squid 2.6.STABLE18 
> (running on RHEL4). As I run traffic through the proxy, the memory 
> grows steadily, and apparently without limit. This increase in memory 
> usage is coupled with a steadily growing CPU usage, up to a point at 
> which a single core is saturated (97% usage at ~400MB of RSS). At this

> point, the latency of requests increases. When the load is taken off 
> the proxy, the CPU returns to minimal usage, but the memory usage 
> sticks at the high water mark.

>  I should point out that I'm using squid for authentication only (HTTP

> digest), not for caching. Consequently, I have maximum_object_size and

> maximum_object_size_in_memory both set to 0 in the squid config file. 
> My understanding is that this should be sufficient to stop squid from 
> caching.
>
>  There's plenty of spare physical RAM on the machine, so it seems 
> unlikely that it's a memory shortage causing the performance problem. 
> My interpretation is that something has gotten too large for Squid to 
> handle but, without object caching, it's not clear to me what that 
> might be. I would blame the authentication cache, but there's only 
> 2000 different users.
>
>  Does anyone have an idea what might be going on, and how to fix it?

There may  be a memory leak somewhere..
Squid 2.6 is rather old, can you try upgrading to the last 2.7 STABLE
release?


    Kinkie

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email
______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email 
______________________________________________________________________


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Samba]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Linux USB]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux