> Just a follow-up, > > Squid3 didn't work as expected for me, so I tried recompiling > 2.6-STABLE22 with the MAX_URL changed to 8192. > > It's working great so far and have moved it into production with no > issues. > > - Gregori > Okay. What was the issue with squid-3 please? Amos > > -----Original Message----- > From: Amos Jeffries [mailto:squid3@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] > Sent: Sunday, November 09, 2008 2:34 AM > To: Gregori Parker > Cc: squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: url length limit > >> It has been tried at 8192 with no sign of trouble in Squid-3. >> If your URL get much large than that, we really do need it checked up > as >> >> high as 128KB so feel free to build with larger values, just please >> report back how it goes (particularly if good news). >> http://www.squid-cache.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=2267 >> >> I'd suggest experimenting with squid 3.1.0.1 to see if its usable in >> your setup. The URL limits have been raised to 8KB already and > diskless >> operation is much more polished and native. >> >> >> As for logging the URI, most things in squid are dropped when they are > >> found to overflow the buffers like that. The details may be logged to > >> cache.log when debug_options is set to the right section and level. > I'm >> not sure right now which one is relevant to 2.6 though, there are a > few >> available. >> http://wiki.squid-cache.org/KnowledgeBase/DebugSections >> >> >> Amos > >
