> From: simonw@xxxxxxxxx > > On Friday 10 October 2008 15:25:19 wiskbroom@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote: >> configure: error: cannot run C++ compiled programs. > > What does it say in "config.log"? > > Betting men say it can't find libstdc++ There was no mention of libstdc++ anywhere in config.log, bu those libs were not in my LD_LIBRARY_PATH neither. I've since then added it and recompiled, I am now getting much further, though now getting this: make[1]: Entering directory `/tmp/squid-3.0.STABLE9/src' /bin/bash ../libtool --tag=CXX --mode=link g++ -Werror -Wall -Wpointer-arith -Wwrite-strings -Wcomments -D_REENTRANT -pthreads -g -O2 -g -o cf_gen cf_gen.o debug.o time.o globals.o libsquid.la libauth.la -L../lib -lmiscutil -lpthread -lm -lresolv -lsocket -lnsl g++ -Werror -Wall -Wpointer-arith -Wwrite-strings -Wcomments -D_REENTRANT -pthreads -g -O2 -g -o cf_gen cf_gen.o debug.o time.o globals.o ./.libs/libsquid.a -L/source/gcc/5.10/4.2.2/5.10/sparc-sun-solaris2.10/libstdc++-v3/src -L/source/gcc/5.10/4.2.2/5.10/sparc-sun-solaris2.10/libstdc++-v3/src/.libs -L/source/gcc/5.10/4.2.2/5.10/./gcc ./.libs/libauth.a -pthreads /local/gcc/5.10/4.2.2/lib/libstdc++.so -L/usr/ccs/lib -lgcc_s -L/local/squid-3.0.STABLE9/lib -lmiscutil -lpthread -lm -lresolv -lsocket -lnsl -Wl,-R -Wl,/local/gcc/5.10/4.2.2/lib -Wl,-R -Wl,/local/gcc/5.10/4.2.2/lib ld: fatal: recording name conflict: file `/local/gcc/5.10/4.2.2/lib/libstdc++.so' and file `/source/gcc/5.10/4.2.2/5.10/sparc-sun-solaris2.10/libstdc++-v3/src/.libs/libstdc++.so' provide identical dependency names: libstdc++.so.6 (possible multiple inclusion of the same file) ld: fatal: File processing errors. No output written to cf_gen collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make[1]: *** [cf_gen] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/local/squid-3.0.STABLE9/src' make: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 root @ squid-cache-box1:/local/squid-3.0.STABLE9> > Any reason you used 4.2 rather than the 4.0 version SUN compile and ship all > lovingly configured, optimized for Sparc, debugged, and supported for $0 ? > >> 2. Does it make sense to try using "-enable-storeio=ufs,aufs" in my > configure line? This worked in Solaris 8. > > Damn a squid question - I'm here to ask them ;) LOL! Thanks, please let me know what you get as an answer... .vp
