Search squid archive

Re: Cache_dir more than 10GB

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 8:49 AM, Francois Cami <fcami@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > I would not run an ext3 filesystem with data=writeback . noatime and
> > nodiratime provide a welcome boost by eliminating unneeded writes,
> > however writeback is not {powerfailure, system crash}-safe. If you
> > value your time (especially the time spent putting systems back up
> > after a system failure), you should use data=ordered.

On 06.10.08 09:19, Kinkie wrote:
> That's of course a possibility.
> It all boils down to the usual performance vs. resiliency tradeoff,
> and it depends on each sysadmin's unique operational situation.

Yes, but using data=writeback is not a tuning, but risking. Using that on
squid cache dir may require cleaning cache_dir after each crash, otherwise
you risk providing invalid data
-- 
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uhlar@xxxxxxxxxxx ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
Micro$oft random number generator: 0, 0, 0, 4.33e+67, 0, 0, 0...

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Samba]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Linux USB]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux