> Is it true that there are problems with Cache_dir more than 10GB? No. I have larger caches here. Some others have caches in the TB range. Only "cache_dir coss" specifically are known to have maximum size issues due to the format design. And not handle large files. There are some related issues known; You might need Squid built with --enable-large-files to get a 64-bit build if you intend to pass entire DVDs through Squid. Squid-2 has issues with handling of very large individual files being somewhat slow. > > Many people talk about it, but I dont found any information in Squid > website. May be I didnt looking for right! > > So, it is true, will be a big problem, because with big hd, more than > 100GB, all to make cache. We will have problem with speed of write and > read in one HD. AUFS on Linux, or DiskD on *BSD should have no problem with that size. Just make sure there is enough RAM in use for a mem-cache and the file indexes. Amos
