I got the service working. Now my old configuration from version 2.4 is not working on 3.0 Stable 2. In theory the traffic was coming from a load balancer and hit the Proxy server. The proxy server then will request 10.2.0.140 for the content. When I try to start the service with my old configuration is having problems with the following lines, is the syntax different? acl all src 0.0.0.0/0.0.0.0 ***warning*** | acl manager proto cache_object | acl localhost src 127.0.0.1/255.255.255.255 acl to_localhost dst | 127.0.0.0/8 acl ssl_ports ports 443 563 acl safe_port port 80 acl | safe_port .... | acl connect method connect | acl mylan src 127.0.0.1 ***Fatal Error*** | acl mysites 10.2.0.140 *** Fatal Error*** | | http_access allow manager localhost | http_access deny manager | http_access deny !safe_port | http_access deny to_localhost | http_access allow mysites | http_access deny all | | http_reply_access allow MYLAN ***Fatal Error*** | http_reply_access allow all Even with the default config I am not able to telnet to port 80 on the squid server. Thanks Gustavo -----Original Message----- From: Christopher Bianchi [mailto:chris@xxxxxxxxxx] Sent: Friday, September 12, 2008 1:19 PM To: squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: Fedora Squid, itself, is a very stable application. Your stability limitation is more likely to be with Fedora. I don't know that you can combine "Fedora" and "Stable". The Fedora team considers the entire operating system as "cutting-edge" and anything but stable. Fedora is (pretty much) a "beta test" for the next version of Red Hat Enterprise. If you're looking for stability in the Red Hat model, you should investigate RHEL or CentOS. But that's just my 2 cents. Chris Bianchi On Fri, September 12, 2008 1:07 pm, Gustavo Lazarte wrote: > Is squid stable on fedora 8? > > Thanks > >
