Search squid archive

Re: source-hash balancing...

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Try something like this:

cache_peer 192.168.1.1 parent 80 0 no-query front-end-https=auto originserver name=origin_1_1 sourcehash cache_peer 192.168.1.2 parent 8080 0 no-query front-end-https=auto originserver name=origin_1_2 sourcehash
acl service_1 dstdomain site.com
cache_peer_access origin_1_1 allow service_1
cache_peer_access origin_1_2 allow service_1



John Doe wrote:
I tried it once with squid 2.6. It did not work. But I would really
like it if that would actually work (i.e. grouping multiple peers
together so one doesn't need to create the same cache_peer_access-rules
for all peers).

Thx for all the replies.
So what would be the alternative method in my case (2 pools of 3 servers)?
Would this work?

  acl u1 dstdomain u1.example.com
  acl u2 dstdomain u2.example.com

  cache_peer_access u1pool1 allow u1
  cache_peer_access u1pool2 allow u1
  cache_peer_access u1pool3 allow u1
  cache_peer_access u1pool1 deny u2
  cache_peer_access u1pool2 deny u2
  cache_peer_access u1pool3 deny u2

  cache_peer_access u2pool1 allow u2
  cache_peer_access u2pool2 allow u2
  cache_peer_access u2pool3 allow u2
  cache_peer_access u2pool1 deny u1
  cache_peer_access u2pool2 deny u1
  cache_peer_access u2pool3 deny u1

Does it spread the requests or won't the first cache_peer_access always be chosen...?

Thx,
JD




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Samba]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Linux USB]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux