Search squid archive

Re: state of gzip/transfer-encoding?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: state of gzip/transfer-encoding?
From: Jeff Peng <jeffpeng@xxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2008 09:45:25 +0800
Cc: Orion Henry <orion.henry@xxxxxxxxx>, squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <F8E5F1C1-B92E-477B-9A15-B78CB98729B7@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <415a0600809011514i5946bdb3l2b608ea474b1f2ff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <F8E5F1C1-B92E-477B-9A15-B78CB98729B7@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (Windows/20080708)

Chris Woodfield wrote:

Squid does not do transfer encoding of objects on its own;

Just be curious, does Squid have the plan to develop the feature ofobjects compression like Apache's mod_deflate? Thanks.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: state of gzip/transfer-encoding?
  - From: Amos Jeffries

References:
- state of gzip/transfer-encoding?
  - From: Orion Henry
- Re: state of gzip/transfer-encoding?
  - From: Chris Woodfield

Prev by Date: Re: source-hash balancing...
Next by Date: Re: state of gzip/transfer-encoding?
Previous by thread: Re: state of gzip/transfer-encoding?
Next by thread: Re: state of gzip/transfer-encoding?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Audio Users] [Samba] [Big List of Linux Books] [Linux USB] [Yosemite News]

Powered by Linux