Did the changeset for the new code get into HEAD?
Cheers,
On 22/07/2008, at 8:38 AM, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
On ons, 2008-07-16 at 09:34 +0200, Kinkie wrote:
On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 11:03 PM, Mark Nottingham <mnot@yahoo-
inc.com> wrote:
+1 - both cases are useful.
On 10/07/2008, at 1:15 AM, Chris Woodfield wrote:
Bug filed, #2406.
As I annotated in the bug report, this behavior does have its
uses, but
not having access to the URL pre-rewrite is clearly broken
behavior IMO. My
idea solution would restore 2.6's behavior, but also add a
logformat code to
log the URL post-rewrite in addition to pre-rewrite if desired.
If no
rewriter is configured, this element would print null.
+1 - I agree.
Should be fixed now, together with a couple of related bugs..
Regards
Henrik
--
Mark Nottingham mnot@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
