2008/7/30 Adrian Chadd <adrian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > (gah, why oh why won't gmail do what I said with my damned From:? Oh well..) Sorry :( > > > 2008/7/30 Marcos Dutra <macdutra@xxxxxxxxx>: >> Hi Adrian, >> >> I saw the cacheboy project, is very intersting but, the code of >> cacheboy has the same features of squid example NTLM auth? With > > cacheboy is "just" Squid-2.HEAD with a whole lot of code shuffling. > Squid-2.HEAD should contain all of the 2.7 and 2.6 NTLM authentication > stuff. It's cool, I will test cacheboy. > >> squid-2.6.5 (RHEL 5) in my tests with polymix-1 arrive in 200req/sec >> (COSS + Aufs) but squid performance is very slow to open pages. I >> compiled squid-2.6.21 and I have the same performance above. > > Polygraph can apparently speak NTLM authentication now. You may want > to look into that. Yeah, I running polygraph with NTLM for test performance, but I would like more performance on this server. > > The lookup speed may be related to authentication. Have you tried > disabling authentication for a specific desktop machine and try > browsing? > > I don't it this yet, but the authentication I think is not a problem, I will try this. > > Adrian > One question, squid Vs cacheboy comparision which the better? Thanks Marcos
