Search squid archive

RE: Squid in the Enterpise

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Actually caching is not the major reason for this device. They really just want a proxy (and don't ask why its part of the original contract they drew up). Anyway caching is not something I was going to be worrying about.

R


--- On Thu, 7/17/08, Adam Carter <Adam.Carter@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> From: Adam Carter <Adam.Carter@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: RE:  Squid in the Enterpise
> To: "ML squid" <squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Thursday, July 17, 2008, 8:11 PM
> > you should bear in mind that for a cache to be truly
> effective at
> > bandwidth conservation (if that is your goal) it
> > needs to be placed close to the users.
> 
> Maybe - it depends if you want to save bandwidth on your
> LAN or WAN/Internet pipe. AFAIK most organisations are more
> concerned about WAN utilisation since it's the expensive
> bit, and therefore placing the caches just on the internal
> side of your WAN can be a good solution.

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Samba]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Linux USB]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux